« EgoSurf: EgoSurfing without the guilt - they say... | Main | Viacom's on the move: picks up Xfire for $102M »

April 24, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451e38a69e200d8342a0a4e53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Can we all use the same micro-formats please ?:

» Read/WriteWeb Filter from Read/WriteWeb
- GData and Open Standards (Matt Kaufman from edgeio thinks Google could've done better to support existing open standards like Structured Blogging -- via Jeff Clavier) -The Economist feature on new media (high level look at things like blogging ... [Read More]

» Can we all use the same standards please ? from Social Infrastructure
Cool lots of people are suggesting and rightfully so that we should all be using the same micro-formats and standards. While we will support GData it would have been nice if they used hCard and hCalendar (etc) where appropriate. Some... [Read More]

Comments

Michael Fagan

Things are not as bad as they seem.

Firstly "GData" is basically an Atom Store ( http://bitworking.org/news/Google_Data_APIs_Protocol ), combining the Atom syndiciation format and publishing protocol, along with OpenSearch (which I think they should use more http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/2006/04/20/783/ ). So *unlike* what Google usually does (just invent their own namespace such as for Google Base), they actually make use of existing open formats.

On the other hand, along with GData, they also define some "kinds" of data ( http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/common-elements.html ), which like Google Base, they've gone with their own namespace instead of the common open formats. Unlike usual, however, it seems like they may be receptive to our input http://www.unto.net/unto/work/google-data-apis-and-opensearch/#comment-522 , so there's hope :-)

The comments to this entry are closed.

On the Web


  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from jeffclavier. Make your own badge here.